• Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Media

The Bear Ate My Portfolio

Posted December 2, 2013 by Denis Smirnov

Bear markets occur fairly frequently and are an integral part of investing.  Nonetheless, most investors never learn to accept them regardless of how many cycles they have lived through.  The math of recovering from a portfolio drawdown is unappealing and sometimes downright scary.  For example, it takes 67% increase in the portfolio to recover from a 40% drop and a 100% to break even on a 50% decline (Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1 – Returns Required to Make Up Portfolio Losses

4-1

Most common definition of a bear market in stocks is a 20% drop from the high point.  Sometimes these severe corrections last for years, sometimes they are over in a few months.  Most professional investors analyze bear market top to bottom and not the annual returns.  There is plenty of analysis online that provides these data, you can see an example here or stories with more color here.

However, individual investors tend to look at portfolio returns in terms of years.  For example, 2012 was a good year. 2008 most definitely was a bad year, while 2009 was a great year that didn’t feel like one.  Given our recent history of two major bear markets in the 2000’s decade, one can be forgiven for thinking that markets are “always” crashing and the good years are few and far between.  That is not true.  As shown in Exhibit 2, there were nine negative years for the S&P 500 (proxy for the U.S. stock market) out of 44 since 1970.  Going back even farther to 1930’s, the last decade was not typical and had more negative years than normally (Exhibit 3).

Exhibit 2

4-2

Exhibit 3 – Number of Negative Years by Decade

4-3

Let’s take a look at couple of recent bear markets and see how long it took to recover from them.  If you started 2008 with $100,000 invested in stocks (S&P 500), you would end the year with $63,000 after a steep 37% drop.  The next few years had positive returns and by the end of 2012, the investor was at $108,579 or 8.6% ahead (Exhibit 4).  It took four years to recover (2009-2012) and the ride didn’t feel very nice despite the eventual comeback.  Likewise, the prior drop spanned three years and by the end of 2002 we were down 37.6%, again requiring 60% return to break even.  Once more, it took four years go get there.

Exhibit 4 – Bear Market Drawdown and Recovery

4-4

In the past 44 years, we had six periods of at least one full negative year for the S&P.  They lasted 1.5 years on average and took 2.3 years for a recovery (Exhibit 5).  Three of them very fairly mild, while the other three were quite severe and required 60% return to “climb out of the hole”.  Two out of three severe periods occurred in 2000’s and still feel very fresh.  Many investors are still having a hard time trusting stocks and are sitting on the sidelines in cash.

Exhibit 5 – Recent Bear Market History

4-5

I’m not trying to minimize the impact of bear markets, they can be vicious and tough to deal with especially for older investors.  Nevertheless, the markets inevitably recover if you stay the course.  The real damage to the portfolio occurs when people try to time the market, sell at the bottom and wait way too long to get back in.

In the next post, I’ll take a look at how adding international stocks and bonds to the portfolio changes the numbers.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Pocket
  • Email

Sign up to the newsletter

Categories

  • Bear Markets
  • Bonds
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Financial Planning
  • Indexing
  • Investing
  • IPO
  • Retirement
  • Taxes
  • Uncategorized
  • Valuation

Archives

  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
About
  • Background
  • Who We Are
  • The Gordian Knot
Services
  • Services
  • Planning Process
  • Investment Philosophy
Contact
  • Contact Details
  • Inquiry Form
  • Map
Media
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Reviews
Dave
Denis
 
 
 
 

Gordian Advisors Financial Planner

Office: 2200 E. River Rd., Suite 109, Tucson, AZ 85718

Phone: 520-615-2779

Email: info@gordianadvisors.com

Download Form Form CRS Client Relationship Summary

Download Form ADV Disclosure Brochure

Gordian Advisors may only transact business or render personalized investment advice in those states where we are registered, or have filed notice, or are otherwise excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Material discussed is meant for general illustration and/or informational purposes only, and is not to be construed as investment advice. Nothing on this web-site should be interpreted to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. Although this information has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, please note that individual situations may vary. Therefore, any information should be relied upon only when coordinated with individual professional advice.