• Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Media

Stocks vs. Bonds – Defensive Play Calling

Posted October 9, 2019 by Denis Smirnov

In the last post I discussed the role of bonds in playing portfolio defense. I used 10 Year U.S. Treasuries as a proxy for bonds due to historical data availability. In reality, however, most investors use different kinds of bonds in their portfolios. Another issue is that the calendar year returns often mask significant intra-year moves. So if our goal is to use bonds as shock absorbers, it’s useful to look at the exact time periods when such help is needed. The purpose of this post is to determine which types of bonds do best in stock market downturns.

To illustrate, let’s consider the latest significant pullback in the stock market – a 20% drop from September to December 2018 (Exhibit 1). As you can see some bonds held up just fine, while others declined alongside the market. Then (naturally) on the fast & furious rebound from the bottom on December 24 to the latest market top on July 26, these same riskier bonds like High Yield and Convertibles have bounced much stronger than the safer bonds (Exhibit 2). This is just one example of a downturn, but this relationship holds when looking at other ones. So with that in mind let’s consider what we want from our bonds. If we want offense, i.e. something that will go up the most in good times, we might as well stick with the best offensive instrument – stocks themselves. If, however, we want to dampen the volatility in bad times, buying high quality bonds is the way to go.

Exhibit 1 – Performance of stocks and various bonds in the 2018 downturn

Exhibit 2 – Performance of stocks and various bonds in the 2019 recovery

Now that we laid the groundwork, let’s review a number of turbulent market periods. I went back to back to 1998 and identified significant stock selloffs of over 10% (Exhibit 3). Some of them were painful and protracted bear markets, while others were just quick pullbacks on the way to higher prices.  The way to read the table is to look at each pullback and how various bonds did during it. For the 2018 one you can see that stocks dropped 20.2% while the Total Bond Market (The Agg) went up by 1.5%. Various flavors of High Quality bonds also went up until we get to Investment Grade Corporates which declined by 1%. Then we have Junk & Hybrids in various degrees of negativity. The relationships are quite stable. Total Bond was positive in all 7 of our pullback periods with the average return of 7.1% (not annualized).  Correlation with stock returns in the periods was a negative 65% (good for zig & zag purposes). U.S. Treasury Bonds of longer maturity offer the best defensive characteristics on average. High yield, convertible and Preferreds are NOT good defense for stock declines. They were all negative in all periods and exhibit much higher correlation with stocks than bonds.

Side note: Gold has actually worked great as a hedge with very negative correlation with stocks and relatively weak relationship with bonds. It went up every time the stocks pulled back and had an average gain of 8.5%. I will do a separate post on gold and why I’m not a fan despite its diversification potential.

Exhibit 3 – Performance of various instruments during stock market selloffs

Notes and Takeaways

  • The basic relationship is that higher quality (especially Treasuries) and longer maturity bonds are better at defense.
  • I also analyzed many other investments for their defensive properties. I didn’t want to clog things up with copious analysis tables here, but I would be happy to share them if anyone is interested. Moreover, there are some data history issues as many index funds weren’t around in earlier periods.
  • I tested all sorts of stocks (small, midcap, NASDAQ, foreign of many varieties) and they were all very highly correlated with Total Stock Market. Same goes for equity sectors – most are lousy diversifiers for the market. Real Estate, Utilities & Consumer Staples do behave a little differently but still don’t offer consistent and reliable drop protection.
  • I also tested all sorts of other bond flavors (leveraged loans, short/intermediate/long corporates and treasuries, foreign bonds, MBS, TIPS, money market, etc). The basic relationship on quality and maturity holds in most cases.
  • So why would you just not load up on Long Treasuries and call it a day? (see last column in Exhibit 3). Well, that’s where the massive duration and interest rate risk comes in, so these bonds are not for the faint of heart! See Ben Carlson’s take on it here and here.
  • In the next post I will look at what happens to all these instruments when the rates go up.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Pocket
  • Email

Sign up to the newsletter

Categories

  • Bear Markets
  • Bonds
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Financial Planning
  • Indexing
  • Investing
  • IPO
  • Retirement
  • Taxes
  • Uncategorized
  • Valuation

Archives

  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
About
  • Background
  • Who We Are
  • The Gordian Knot
Services
  • Services
  • Planning Process
  • Investment Philosophy
Contact
  • Contact Details
  • Inquiry Form
  • Map
Media
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Reviews
Dave
Denis
 
 
 
 

Gordian Advisors Financial Planner

Office: 2200 E. River Rd., Suite 109, Tucson, AZ 85718

Phone: 520-615-2779

Email: info@gordianadvisors.com

Download Form Form CRS Client Relationship Summary

Download Form ADV Disclosure Brochure

Gordian Advisors may only transact business or render personalized investment advice in those states where we are registered, or have filed notice, or are otherwise excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Material discussed is meant for general illustration and/or informational purposes only, and is not to be construed as investment advice. Nothing on this web-site should be interpreted to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. Although this information has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, please note that individual situations may vary. Therefore, any information should be relied upon only when coordinated with individual professional advice.