• Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Media

Stock Market Sectors – Looking Under the Hood

Posted September 28, 2017 by Denis Smirnov

I got a lot of feedback on the post about Corporate Bonds. Related to that article, I wanted to post some of the work I’ve been doing analyzing stock market sector composition, how big each one is and what’s actually in them. It’s important to know what you are actually buying, be it Total Stock Market Index or Sector ETFs. I’ll use SPDR Sector ETFs (Spiders) for my analysis since they are the largest and most followed sector products on the market. Essentially they take the S&P 500 index and break out underlying 500 stocks (actual number is 505) into 10 component sectors.  Exhibit 1 shows SPDR sectors sorted by market size. It also shows some size stats based on market capitalization (#1 in each columns highlighted in green, #10 in orange). Technology is by far the largest sector and it only keeps growing relative to the rest of the market. The average market cap of its top 10 holdings is $412 billion or over two times that of the runner up Financials at $192 billion! Bottom three sectors are pretty small at 3%, but Utilities and Real Estate are still attractive to income investors.

Exhibit 1 – Sector Representation of the S&P 500 Index (as of 9/25/2017)

Now let’s dig into each fund to see what’s driving them. Exhibit 2 shows top 20 companies in each sector so you can see what you are actually buying when investing in these funds. Here are my random thoughts and observations on each sector:

Technology (XLK)

  • By far the largest sector, it is dominated by companies with market caps of hundreds of billions
  • Note that due to sector classification rules, there are some large companies that are not included in this ETF even though most people would consider them technology outfits – Amazon.com ($450bn), Priceline ($90bn) & Netflix ($77bn) are all included in Consumer Discretionary.
  • Also beware that the granddaddy of them all – $800bn Apple – is sometimes classified as Consumer company by some other classification methods (although SPDR does include it in tech).
  • Google’s dual share classes make things a bit confusing and can lead to double-counting it
  • There are some companies I wouldn’t consider tech here – telcos AT&T/Verizon and payment networks Visa/MasterCard (I guess PayPal too?)
  • And look at the market darling NVDA moving up in the world. Its market cap doubled from $50bn just this year alone. And it was just $15bn in January 2016! VR and self-driving cars are good for it…

Financials (XLF)

  • Warren Buffet is the man!, although calling Berkshire a Financial is a stretch these days as he’s buying up everything from railroads to utilities and industrials.
  • Mega-banks are still “too big to fail” and getting bigger. Although watch the blockchain disruption here (not Bitcoin, but it’s underlying technology)! Jamie Dimon has a vested interest in poo-pooing it.
  • Investment banks and asset management companies are well-represented too, as are various insurers
  • Credit rater S&P Global didn’t miss a step despite being less than helpful during the financial crisis

Healthcare (XLV)

  • Pharma, biotech and health insurer consolidation has created some big players here! It’s a tough sector and scale is important.
  • We’ll probably continue to see deals in this space as the big guys buy promising drugs to build up pipeline.
  • Also, depending what happens with Obama/Trump care, there might be some shakeout in health insurance.

Consumer Discretionary (XLY)

  • What a mish-mash this is. And likely to look very different in 5-10 years as fickle consumer tastes change. Cable TV, retail, non-electric cars and fast food sure look like dinosaurs!
  • Note that despite having larger market cap than GM and Ford, Tesla is not included in the S&P 500 index.

Industrials (XLI)

  • Despite the name, Defense & Transports rule here.
  • Among transports rails are big, but the first airline doesn’t appear until #24 with Southwest Air at $32bn market value (it pays to be good to your customers!)

Consumer Staples (XLP)

  • Soda pop & cigarettes – enough said!
  • At some point the growing health-consciousness in the U.S./Europe will catch up with these guys, but then there is always Third World consumers to go after.

Energy (XLE)

  • Used to be MUCH bigger sector but years of sliding oil/gas prices do wonders to realign capital flows, let Capitalism work!
  • Remember when Exxon was bigger than Apple? Ha, how cute 🙂

Utilities (XLU)

  • Boring stuff, but that’s the way in should be. Can’t get too big with regulatory oversight.
  • When interest rates actually do go up, it’ll be interesting to see how this sector handles investor shift.

Real Estate (XLRE)

  • This sector was part of XLF until it was broken out into a separate one on September 1, 2016.
  • There’s been some reshuffling here with Retail REITs hurting and various Specialties doing better.

Materials (XLB)

  • All kinds of companies here, from chemicals to miners, from packaging/paper to building materials.
  • Despite sounding boring, some of these guys fly during particular market periods. As far as I’m concerned, it’s just another good reason to use broad indices.

 

If you are interested in how sector weights have changed over time, Bespoke has some cool analyses here.

Exhibit 2 – Top 20 Companies by Sector (as of 9/25/2017)

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Pocket
  • Email

Sign up to the newsletter

Categories

  • Bear Markets
  • Bonds
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Financial Planning
  • Indexing
  • Investing
  • IPO
  • Retirement
  • Taxes
  • Uncategorized
  • Valuation

Archives

  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
About
  • Background
  • Who We Are
  • The Gordian Knot
Services
  • Services
  • Planning Process
  • Investment Philosophy
Contact
  • Contact Details
  • Inquiry Form
  • Map
Media
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Reviews
Dave
Denis
 
 
 
 

Gordian Advisors Financial Planner

Office: 2200 E. River Rd., Suite 109, Tucson, AZ 85718

Phone: 520-615-2779

Email: info@gordianadvisors.com

Download Form Form CRS Client Relationship Summary

Download Form ADV Disclosure Brochure

Gordian Advisors may only transact business or render personalized investment advice in those states where we are registered, or have filed notice, or are otherwise excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Material discussed is meant for general illustration and/or informational purposes only, and is not to be construed as investment advice. Nothing on this web-site should be interpreted to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. Although this information has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, please note that individual situations may vary. Therefore, any information should be relied upon only when coordinated with individual professional advice.