• Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Media

Is the Sky Falling on Index Investing?

Posted August 18, 2015 by Denis Smirnov

I saw this Barron’s article (pay-walled) and decided to see what all the fuss is about in the active manager comeback story. It seems every few months there are press articles or analyst research pieces that proclaim the beginning of “the stock picker’s market”. There was one in Financial Times in January 2014 or one here in August 2013. In the blogosphere, Josh Brown and Ben Carlson have chronicled this game nicely here, here, here and here.

Clearly this “correlation breakdown” story didn’t work out so well the last few times. Is this time different? I have no idea, we’ll have to wait and see. To track such things, there is widely-followed SPIVA scorecard (discussed here), but it only comes out twice a year. However, I can give you an easy way to keep score at home.

All you need is access to free Morningstar page and a ticker symbol for an index fund that belongs in a category you are interested in. I’m going to use the following Vanguard index funds in my analysis (Exhibit 1). Click on Morningstar performance page for any fund, scroll down to “Trailing Total Returns” table and then look at the “Rank in Category” line. For example, Vanguard Large Cap Index Inv (VLACX) ranks at 33% YTD. This means that 33% of other funds in Large Blend category have done better than it, while the remaining 67% have done worse. Since vast majority of the other funds in this category are actively managed, it’s a great proxy for their relative performance. (Note that this only works for index mutual funds and not ETFs which have their own rankings – more on this later).

Exhibit 1 – Vanguard Index Funds in Major Categories

34-1

Now, let’s arrange these index funds in the Morningstar Stylebox to see how they stack up versus active counterparts. The results for the past few years are shown in Exhibit 2. The numbers below 50% are highlighted in orange and indicate that average active fund has done better than the index. Apparently active funds didn’t get the memo about 2015 ostensibly being “the year of a stock picker” (again!). If the best you can do is 58% of funds beating index in a small growth space… Across all categories, the average “beat rate” is only 38%. Moreover, I would argue that the middle column (blend funds) are by far the more important one (more on that in the next post) and it’s not looking so good for our fund manager friends. Looking back at the past few years, the numbers are similarly mediocre with 2014 being particularly horrid for the active funds.

Exhibit 2 – Vanguard Index Funds Rank in Category by Morningstar Stylebox

34-2

If we zoom out from single years, longer-term results look even worse for the managers (Exhibit 3). But we already now that from SPIVA publications. And just in case you were wondering if the turnaround JUST STARTED – it didn’t – 1 day, 1 week, 1 month & 3 month results are equally bleak!

Exhibit 3 – Longer-term Vanguard Index Funds Rankings

34-3

So there you have it – no turnaround yet, but go ahead and keep score if you wish.

Morningstar Methodology

Category performance ranking by MS is quite convoluted, or as The Dude would say “This is a very complicated case, Maude. You know, a lotta ins, a lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous. And, uh, a lotta strands to keep in my head, man. “

I plan on doing a deeper dive to see how it’s all calculated in the next post.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Pocket
  • Email

Sign up to the newsletter

Categories

  • Bear Markets
  • Bonds
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Financial Planning
  • Indexing
  • Investing
  • IPO
  • Retirement
  • Taxes
  • Uncategorized
  • Valuation

Archives

  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
About
  • Background
  • Who We Are
  • The Gordian Knot
Services
  • Services
  • Planning Process
  • Investment Philosophy
Contact
  • Contact Details
  • Inquiry Form
  • Map
Media
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Reviews
Dave
Denis
 
 
 
 

Gordian Advisors Financial Planner

Office: 2200 E. River Rd., Suite 109, Tucson, AZ 85718

Phone: 520-615-2779

Email: info@gordianadvisors.com

Download Form Form CRS Client Relationship Summary

Download Form ADV Disclosure Brochure

Gordian Advisors may only transact business or render personalized investment advice in those states where we are registered, or have filed notice, or are otherwise excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Material discussed is meant for general illustration and/or informational purposes only, and is not to be construed as investment advice. Nothing on this web-site should be interpreted to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. Although this information has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, please note that individual situations may vary. Therefore, any information should be relied upon only when coordinated with individual professional advice.