• Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Media

Preservation??!!

Posted February 12, 2018 by David Hamra

The recent market upheaval was difficult for nearly all stock investors but one popular strategy had disastrous results. The “low volatility” strategy wagered that the smooth ups and downs the market had enjoyed for the last couple of years would continue. As volatility went through the roof overnight, several funds that were dedicated to this strategy, and incorporated low volatility in their names, went out of existence.

Then there’s the LJM Preservation and Growth Fund with the following objective: “The investment seeks capital appreciation and capital preservation with low correlation to the broader U.S. equity market . . . The Fund’s investment management team will also buy options to help mitigate the impact of sudden price moves and potentially add incremental return.” In other words, the fund strives to act differently than the stock market, help preserve the value of investments and partially insulate investors from dramatic market swings.

The fund apparently abandoned the mitigation of the impact of sudden price moves. Instead it bet the house on low volatility and as of February 7 had declined by 82% (no, that is not a typo).

As recently as February 1 (yes, the day before the market went into shock) the fund manager issued a “perspective” on using market volatility in a portfolio. “When considering a volatility strategy, investors and advisors should first determine what primary function they want the investment to play in their portfolio—diversification, incremental income, or hedging. They should also understand the best and worst environments for the strategies and how they’re being executed.” It seems these strategies are good for any investment objective. An accompanying chart illustrates market conditions in which various strategies would do well but there was no mention at all of how these strategies could backfire.

It’s a wonder how this fund attracted nearly $800 million in the first place. Since its inception in January, 2013 the fund had nearly as much volatility as the S&P 500, the same number of up and down months, a 2% greater decline in the worst quarter and a 3% less increase in the best quarter. The fund’s expense ratio is 3.24% or 2.49% with an upfront sales charge (there’s a bargain share class with expenses of 2.24% if more than $100,000 is invested). It seems plenty of investors were willing to accept high fees and poor performance in hopes that this fund would magically protect them in a market downturn.

A straightforward well-diversified portfolio that focuses on major asset classes (stocks, bonds, maybe real estate) without gimmicks or complicated strategies is certainly not a panacea. And there are unquestionably opportunities to generate high returns by taking greater risks. But investing blindly or in uncontrolled strategies is just asking for trouble.

Here’s a simple rule of investing. If you want to invest in a market and accept the risks, go ahead. If you are concerned that the risks of a market are too great, stay out of that market. Don’t try to have it both ways.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Pocket
  • Email

Sign up to the newsletter

About
  • Background
  • Who We Are
  • The Gordian Knot
Services
  • Services
  • Planning Process
  • Investment Philosophy
Contact
  • Contact Details
  • Inquiry Form
  • Map
Media
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Reviews
Dave
Denis
 
 
 
 

Gordian Advisors Financial Planner

Office: 2200 E. River Rd., Suite 109, Tucson, AZ 85718

Phone: 520-615-2779

Email: info@gordianadvisors.com

Download Form Form CRS Client Relationship Summary

Download Form ADV Disclosure Brochure

Gordian Advisors may only transact business or render personalized investment advice in those states where we are registered, or have filed notice, or are otherwise excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Material discussed is meant for general illustration and/or informational purposes only, and is not to be construed as investment advice. Nothing on this web-site should be interpreted to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. Although this information has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, please note that individual situations may vary. Therefore, any information should be relied upon only when coordinated with individual professional advice.