• Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Media

Active Funds Have Their [One] Day in the Sun!

Posted August 31, 2015 by Denis Smirnov

So last Monday (August 24) when all hell broke loose in the markets, active funds actually had a good day relative to their Vanguard index fund benchmarks (Exhibit 1). For more on methodology and the idea behind this analysis see my last post. Among all categories, 63% beat their corresponding index fund with only Small Value coming in below 50% (48% of Small Value funds did better than Vanguard Small Cap Value Index Inv). Small Growth funds had the best showing with 71% of funds outperforming. As you can see from the second panel in the chart, all of the categories had a miserable day (it’s a heat map to show relative performance). In general, the categories the dropped the most exhibited better rankings by active funds.

Exhibit 1 – Vanguard Index Funds Rank in Category by Morningstar Stylebox for Aug 24

34-1

So what is behind this “victory”. There is a lot of research out there showing that for active funds to do better than their benchmarks three things have to outperform: small cap, international stocks and cash. Here is a good summary from Josh Brown, or a more detailed research from GMO if you are so inclined. So what did we see on Monday (Exhibit 2)? Sure enough, all three of the preconditions are there.

Exhibit 2 – Relative Performance of Asset Classes for Aug 24

34-2

Another important point is fund expenses. The main reason active funds chronically underperform index funds is much higher expense ratios. However, it takes a longer time (a year or more) to fully manifest in NAV performance and fund rankings. Let’s say an active Large Blend fund charges 100 bps (1%) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF charges 5 bps. Well over one year (or three, or five) the 95 bps differential really adds up. But for a one day ranking, 1/365th of 95 bps is a quarter basis point which is less than the NAV rounding threshold.

And since last week was kind enough (?) to provide us with back-to-back examples of really bad and really good days, let’s see what happened in Wednesday’s rebound (Exhibit 3). Naturally, active managers got trounced by Vanguard funds. Note that active managers “lost ” by a higher 73% margin than when they “won” by 63%. And as you might suspect, our three preconditions were perfectly aligned again (and with a great impact).

Exhibit 3 – Vanguard Index Funds Rank in Category by Morningstar Stylebox for Aug 26

34-3

Exhibit 4 – Relative Performance of Asset Classes for Aug 26

34-4

Conclusion

Active funds will have good days (and quarters and years, and maybe even a 3-year period here and there). But over time their higher expense ratios make it tough to keep pace with much cheaper index funds.  Oh yeah, and rest assured that longer-term rankings as of August 28 are still in favor of index funds (by a lot).

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Pocket
  • Email

Sign up to the newsletter

Categories

  • Bear Markets
  • Bonds
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Financial Planning
  • Indexing
  • Investing
  • IPO
  • Retirement
  • Taxes
  • Uncategorized
  • Valuation

Archives

  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
About
  • Background
  • Who We Are
  • The Gordian Knot
Services
  • Services
  • Planning Process
  • Investment Philosophy
Contact
  • Contact Details
  • Inquiry Form
  • Map
Media
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Reviews
Dave
Denis
 
 
 
 

Gordian Advisors Financial Planner

Office: 2200 E. River Rd., Suite 109, Tucson, AZ 85718

Phone: 520-615-2779

Email: info@gordianadvisors.com

Download Form Form CRS Client Relationship Summary

Download Form ADV Disclosure Brochure

Gordian Advisors may only transact business or render personalized investment advice in those states where we are registered, or have filed notice, or are otherwise excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Material discussed is meant for general illustration and/or informational purposes only, and is not to be construed as investment advice. Nothing on this web-site should be interpreted to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. Although this information has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, please note that individual situations may vary. Therefore, any information should be relied upon only when coordinated with individual professional advice.